Here’s why “fake news” sites are dangerous
In a world of lies, deceit, distortion and scheming of all kinds, it's only natural to hear the same arrogant dishonest politicians and mainstream media hold the increasing “disinformation” on the Internet and social media responsible for the failure of their propaganda. Are truthseekers and brave whisleblowers to blame for the host of skeletons these good people — all politically but not humanly correct — have stacked in their closet over the course of their wild abusive unpunished rides beginning to stick out or for the fruitlessness of their attempts to impede the massive awakening of consciousness by all (inconceivable) means and ways in order to maintain their hegemony? It's a low-flying panic attack, the rats are freaking out big time. And when these ladies and gentlemen are losing it, there's no room for half-measures or subtlety. As reports Waking Times Media, “After the absurdity that was the 2016 presidential election, Hillary Clinton supporters and establishment Democrats excoriated Zuckerberg for dereliction of duty in failing to remove sham news articles and sites from his wildly popular platform (Facebook) — because, in their eyes, this putative “fake” news literally swung the election toward Donald Trump.” (Source) But truly that!
The war on fake news is now officially on, targeting not only social media (Facebook and Twitter) but also the whole of the Internet. “A brand new website, propornot.com, has just made its appearance condemning a list of 200 Internet websites that provide news and views at variance with the presstitute media that serves the governments’ agendas”, writes American journalist and economist Paul Craig Roberts. He continues pointing at the Washington Post as “a prime apologist for these war criminals” whose total crimes exceed those of Nazi Germany. “The entire Western print and TV media”, he says, “is so heavily implicated in the worst war crimes in human history that, if justice ever happens, the presstitutes will stand in the dock with the Clintons, George W. Bush and Dick Cheney, Obama and their neocon operatives or handlers as the case may be.” (Source). And it doesn't stop with politics, of course (just one example, alternative health site Natural News is featured on the above-mentioned list).
Pigs, don't grunt! When the wolves are done with all the evil-minded coyotes and jackals, you may grow wings, what's the use then when there'll be nowhere left to fly to?
Here is your daily mantra: “narrow the range of thought, narrow the range of thought.”
Exposing elites who run the world?
Exposing pedophile networks?
Documenting the lies and fabrications of major media?
Laying bare the manipulations of Globalists?
Revealing the crimes of both major political parties in America?
Uncovering the spread of pharmaceutical devastation?
Tracking the ruthless ops of major corporations?
Yes, many so-called “fake news” sites do all this and much more—but something else is also going on.
Many of these sites were launched and are spearheaded by ONE man or woman.
No person outside the mainstream is supposed to be so emboldened by his/her own point of view and passion.
Tags: media, society, repost
CommentsNo comments yet
Suivre le flux RSS des commentaires